Promotional giveaway for the full Professional license Fulfill any combination of requirements below that add up to 450 pts or more to claim your free license for the full UCalc Fast Math Parser 2.0 Professional* edition (a $450 value). The variety of options to choose from is designed so that anyone can easily claim the free license. Send an e-mail entitled "UCalc FMP experimental promotion", listing the item(s) (with proof where applicable) you are claiming points for:   Pts Requirement A 450 Be the first person on any given week to post a message in the UCalc forums. Details B 450 Post a UCalc related message in a forum outside of ucalc.com. Details C 350 Familiarize yourself with the beta for the next version of UCalc FMP. Details D 300 For members of the academic community (students, teachers, researchers, ...). Details E 300 Be the first person on any given day of the week to post in the UCalc forums. Details F 300 Programmers who are Microsoft MVP members can claim 300 pts. Details G 300 Mention UCalc Fast Math Parser on your website. Details H 300 Create a valuable add-on for UCalc FMP. Details I 250 Discuss UCalc with the procurement department of your organization. Details J 250 Fill out the questionnaire for UCalc FMP. Details K 200 Mention your product's use of UCalc FMP in your product's documentation file. L 200 Mention (in person) info about UCalc FMP to a group of programmers. Details M 100 Sign up for the uCalc e-mail newsletter. Details N 100 A message in the UCalc forums that doesn't qualify for more gets 100 pts. Details O 100 Send a brief quote that can be used as a product testimonial. Details P 50+ 50 pts for each message containing a tagline with blurb about UCalc FMP. Details Q 50 Bookmark ucalc.com in your web browser so you can remember to visit again. Did you find a bad idea that should be removed from the list?  Thought of a clever item that should be added?  Is there a requirement that should be worth more points?  Is there a confusing requirement that needs clarification?  Is there a problem with the overall presentation of the deal?  If so, please e-mail a suggestion. The contents of this page were last revised on 2-20-06.